SaaS Metrics Palooza - October 2024

Slides presented at SaaS Metrics Palooza 2024 by Matt Harney, Founder of Cloud Ratings.

SaaS Historical Benchmarks - 2010 To 2023

2010 to 2021 Benchmarks:

‘10-’21 Change

‘10-’21 CAGR 2022 2023

‘10-’23 Change

'10-’23 CAGR

‘10-’23 Heatmap

2010 2021

Net Revenue Retention 106% 109% 3% Gross Revenue Churn 5% 14% 9% % Revenue From Expansion 19% 46% 27%

103% 101% (5%) 11% 11% 6% 33% 35% 16%

New Logo CAC $0.93 $1.78 91% 6% $1.76 $1.76

89% 5%

Expansion CAC $0.28 $0.61

118% 7% $0.69 $1.00 257% 11%

Field Sales CAC $1.00 $2.07 107% 7% Inside Sales CAC $0.90 $1.40 56% 4%

2022 to 2023 Benchmarks:

Revenue Per Employee ($k) * $142 $143

1% 0%

$156

10% 1%

Margins: Gross Margin 71% 73% 2% Sales + Marketing 32% 40% 8%

72% 74% 3% 34% 34% 2% 30% 30% 7% 24% 23% 9%

R+D 23% 25% 2% G+A 14% 19% 5%

EBITDA 1% (10%)

(11%)

(10%) (10%)

(10%)

Full 2009-2023 Study

Revenue Growth 45% 28% (17%) Rule of 40 ** 46% 18% (28%)

30% 27% (18%) 14% 14% (32%)

Software In 2024: A Maturing Growth Industry

Source: Pacific Crest / Key Banc / Benchmarkit Surveys. *: Rev/FTE starts 2014 **: 2022 + 2023: Derived from P&L, differs from report median. Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

SaaS Funding History - 2008 - 2024

($ in millions)

Early Stage

Late Stage

$14,000

"A decade ago, an interesting category would have ~2-3 companies at the Series A. Now, there can be 10+" - tenured, Series A-focused enterprise GP

$12,000

$10,000

Stripe - Series I: $6.5b - Mar’23

$8,000

$6,000

$4,000

$2,000

$0

Source: Crunchbase Hubs Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Quadrant View: Crowded

GRID EXAMPLE

Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Product + NPS: Be So Good They Can’t Ignore You FACTOR VS GRID RANK

Leaders

High Performers

Contenders

Niche

Grid Rank:

High Performers Leaders

Meets Requirements

Niche Contenders

High Performers Leaders

Ease of Use

Niche Contenders

High Performers Leaders

Ease of Set Up

Niche Contenders

Competitors age poorly = ongoing opportunity

High Performers Leaders

Ease of Admin

Niche Contenders

Emerging, younger High Performers need outsized NPS to break through

High Performers Leaders

Ease of Doing Business

Modest differences in user experience factors... add up to a large NPS gap

Niche Contenders

High Performers Leaders

Quality of Support

Niche Contenders

High Performers Leaders

Product Direction

Niche Contenders

High Performers Leaders

NPS

Niche Contenders

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

Cloud Ratings + G2 Primary Research Covering 4,222 Software Companies Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter + @G2dotcom

Higher NPS Is Achievable

FACTOR R-SQUARES VS NPS

FOR EARLY STAGE

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

Quality of Support

0.61

Very Achievable

Somewhat Achievable

Meets Requirements

0.59

Very Achievable

Ease of Doing Business

0.57

Very Achievable

0.56

Ease of Use

Very Achievable

Ease of Set Up

0.46

0.45

Product Direction

Very Achievable

ROI

0.16

Very Achievable ***

0.13

Year Founded

Impossible

0.13

Months To Go Live

Very Achievable

Adoption 0.01

Somewhat Achievable

*** ROI: Early-stage software companies tend to underinvest in ROI messaging + proof vs established leaders Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter + @G2dotcom

SDR View: Effort Up, Results Down

# Attempts In A Cadence Quality Conversations Per Day

12.0

10.0

Attempts: 11.3

QC's: 8

8.0

6.0

Attempts: 7.3

4.0

QC's: 3.6

2.0

0.0

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

Source: The Bridge Group Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

AE View: Missed Quota, Slower Ramps

Quota Attainment

Ramp > 5 Months

80.0

80%

5+ Mo Ramp: 63%

60.0

60%

Quota: 74%

Quota: 51%

41%-48%

40.0

40%

20%

20.0

5+ Mo Ramp: 17%

0.0

2012

2015

2017

2020

2022

2024

Source: The Bridge Group, RepVue Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

New Check Engine Lights - via

TOP REP OUTPERFORMANCE

ICP PIPELINE MIX ICP represents only 18% of pipeline ICP pipeline flat

.00

16% of reps generate 83% of revenue in H1 2024

10.2x

.00

8.9x

.00

6x

.00

4x

.00

.00

.00

2022

2023 - H1

2023 - H2 2024 - H1

Source: Ebsta + Pavilion Sales Benchmarks Reports Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Missed 2024 Forecasts Unacceptable

90% Confidence Level: “I should come in under my forecast once every 2.5 years (10 quarters).” - Dave Kellogg

Source: Pavilion Member Pulse Report, Dave Kellogg on Kellblog.com Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Poor Forecasts Drove GTM Overhiring In 2022

= Sales Net Hires / Fires

+29% Capacity Post Market Peak

= Marketing Net Hires / Fires

+ Alto Model

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Index Components: Proprietary to Cloud Ratings | Data Source: People Data Labs Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

C-Suite More Involved + FOMU: Fear Of Messing Up

Engaging the CXO early in stage increases sales velocity by 9.2x

Top performers are 250% more likely to have the C-suite engaged early

Source: G2 CMO at SaaStr 2024, Ebsta + Pavilion Sales Benchmarks Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

It All Comes Back to ROI

Source: G2, Cloud Ratings, Morgan Stanley Counterpoint Global Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

ROI More Important Than Ever -> Discuss Early

Source: Ebsta + Pavilion Sales Benchmarks Reports Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

AI ROI by Function - via

Too Early to Tell

Little to no ROI (<5%)

Some ROI (5-20%)

Significant ROI (20+%)

Too Early to Tell

Little to no ROI (<5%)

Some ROI (5-20%)

Significant ROI (20+%)

3%

13%

21%

29%

42%

42%

63%

59%

58%

26%

42%

57%

32%

11%

13% 8%

13%

21%

17%

14%

10%

6%

Product + Engineering

Information Technology

Marketing

N=36 Sales

Finance N=22

Operations N=40

N=51

N=50

N=36

Cloud Ratings analysis of ICONIQ Growth’s “State of AI” Report. Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

AI = Winning The Next Game

"It's not small sales teams with credit cards that can go swipe. It's actually the market-leading companies that like winning because they see AI and think, ' We won the last game, and now AI helps us win the future . How do we get AI to as many people in our organization as possible?' "

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

Matt Slotnick Co-Founder + CEO

When selling AI in ‘24/’25 -> ICP = Winners + Leaders

Reminder: ICP Win Rates Are 2x - 3x via

ON OUR PODCAST:

Source: McKinsey, scaleMatters, Ebsta, Poggio Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Signs Of Hope - via

Source: Battery Ventures Social Attribution: @CloudRatings + @SaaSletter

Key Messages A Maturing Growth Industry Best Seen At “Tip of Spear” It All Comes Back To ROI C-Suite ROI Proof Early In Sales Cycle -> We Can Help Opportunities

Be So Good They Can’t Ignore You AI Revitalizes Software Growth Story Better Forecasts -> More On This Soon

Matt Harney matt.harney@cloudratings.com | @saasletter | saasletter.com

About Us

ROI STUDIES

QUADRANTS

INDICES

MEDIA

NEWSLETTER

SAAS DEMAND INDEX

METHODOLOGY: PUBLIC DATA ENHANCED WITH PRIVATE VENDOR DATA VIA ANALYST RFI

SAAS EMPLOYMENT INDEX

OPERATOR PODCAST

B2B AI INTEREST INDEX

INVESTOR PODCAST

PARTNERSHIP: ENHANCED WITH G2 DATA FOR ROI + IMPLEMENTATION + CUSTOMER MIX

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20

cloudratings.com

Powered by